![]() If you have another 5.44 Meg file, from a different camera or program, it might result in a different size for the ICO file as well. Even if both our files were the same dimensions, the amount of EXIF data might vary in our 5.44 Meg files. ![]() ![]() Two files having the same size on the disk may be very different in picture data. The resultant ICO was 960,062 bytes from both. All of my JPG source files were 3456x2304 at 72 ppi. Next, I chose one that 2.65 Meg, and likewise ended up with an ICO file of 24,883,262 bytes for both programs. The output ICO was also 24,883,262 bytes for both programs. Since my ICO result file was different from your 35 Meg value, I picked a different JPG file that was 5.65 Meg. Likewise, the two ICO files look identical, however an MD5 calculation shows that they are indeed different in spite of having the same exact size:Ä 6401522 a505ccc4 fbf7d0d9 eef3ffc2 IrfanViewĬ01b4db3 cac6a637 ee0c9c96 2cc8f65d reaConverter Toggling back and forth between the original JPG and ICO files, there was no noticeable difference in appearance. Using that same source file, both reaConverter and IrfanView created an output ICO file that was 24,883,262 bytes (both having the same dimensions as the original file). I sorted a large group of JPG files by size, and then selected one that was 5.44 Meg. If you use IrfanView to save the same JPG file as an ICO, you probably will end up with a file with the exact same size as the one that reaConverter created. I agree a large ICO file is not very usable, however reaConverter is merely doing a conversion, the same as IrfanView does (not resizing).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |